Research Overview

Goal: Develop reasoning algorithms that operate natively in hyperdimensional space, enabling associative inference beyond traditional symbolic logic.

Key insight: HDC vectors encode semantic relationships in their geometry. This structure enables reasoning operations that discover implicit knowledge.

1. The Master Equation

The foundation of holographic reasoning is the HDC Master Equation:

Answer = KB BIND Query−1

Where:

This single equation supports retrieval, completion, and inference in constant time.

2. HDC Operations for Reasoning

HDC Algebra for Reasoning Binding ( BIND ) role BIND filler Creates role-filler pairs Preserves similarity Bundling (+) v₁ + v₂ + ... + vₙ Superposition of vectors Similar to all inputs Unbinding (⊖) pair BIND role⁻¹ = filler Retrieves bound filler Query answering Similarity (δ) cos(v₁, v₂) or Hamming Measures semantic closeness Enables fuzzy matching Permutation (ρ) ρ(v) shuffles elements Encodes sequence/structure Preserves information Cleanup (σ) σ(v) → nearest known Maps to clean memory Noise reduction

3. Analogical Reasoning Algorithm

HDC-Native Analogy: Given "A is to B as C is to ?", compute the answer using vector algebra:
? = C BIND (B BIND A−1)

The relation (B BIND A−1) is extracted and applied to C to find the analogous concept.

// Analogical reasoning in HDC

function solveAnalogy(A, B, C, cleanupMemory) {
  // Step 1: Extract the relation from A→B
  const relation = bind(B, inverse(A));  // B BIND A⁻¹

  // Step 2: Apply relation to C
  const rawAnswer = bind(C, relation);   // C BIND relation

  // Step 3: Cleanup to nearest known concept
  return cleanup(rawAnswer, cleanupMemory);
}

// Example: king:man :: queen:?
const answer = solveAnalogy(
  vectors.king,
  vectors.man,
  vectors.queen,
  conceptMemory
);
// answer ≈ vectors.woman (high similarity)

4. Compositional Structure Encoding

HDC can encode structured knowledge using role-filler bindings:

// Encoding: "John loves Mary"

const fact = bundle([
  bind(roles.agent, entities.john),
  bind(roles.action, verbs.love),
  bind(roles.patient, entities.mary)
]);

// Query: "Who does John love?"
const query = bind(roles.agent, entities.john);
const answer = unbind(fact, query);
// Cleanup → entities.mary

// Query: "Who loves Mary?"
const query2 = bind(roles.patient, entities.mary);
const answer2 = unbind(fact, query2);
// Cleanup → entities.john

5. Transitive Inference in HDC

For transitive relations like IS-A, we can chain inferences:

isA(X, Z) = cleanup(X BIND isA⁻¹ BIND isA⁻¹)

Each application of isA⁻¹ moves one step up the hierarchy.

Inference Type HDC Operation Example
Direct lookup cleanup(X BIND relation⁻¹) isA(Cat) → Mammal
Transitive (2 steps) cleanup(X BIND rel⁻¹ BIND rel⁻¹) isA(Cat) → Animal
Property inheritance cleanup(X BIND isA⁻¹ BIND has⁻¹) has(Cat) → warm_blooded
Reverse lookup cleanup(Y BIND relation) What is a Mammal? → Cat, Dog, ...

6. Confidence and Noise

HDC operations accumulate noise. The confidence decreases with inference depth:

Confidence Decay Model 0 1 2 3 4 Inference Depth 0 0.5 1.0 Confidence Direct (1.0) 1-step (0.95) 2-step (0.85) 3-step (0.72) 4-step (0.58)

Confidence Formula:

C(n) = C₀ × αn

Where α ≈ 0.85-0.95 depending on vector dimensionality and noise level.

7. Research Challenges

Challenge Current Status Proposed Solution
Noise accumulation Limits depth to ~4-5 steps Iterative cleanup, higher dimensions
Negation handling No natural representation Dedicated negation vectors, bipolar encoding
Variable binding Limited to role-filler patterns Placeholder vectors, substitution algebra
Rule application Requires symbolic fallback Holographic rule encoding
Contradiction detection Not implemented in HDC Orthogonality testing

8. Hybrid Architecture

AGISystem2 combines HDC with symbolic reasoning:

Hybrid Reasoning Pipeline Query HDC Master Eq Symbolic Engine Result Fusion Answer Fast (O(1)) but approximate Slow but precise

9. Future Directions

10. Related Resources